Comments on: Quick Takes – 7/28/07 http://www.rayfowler.org/2007/07/28/quick-takes-7-28-07/ Thoughts on God and life from a Christian perspective Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:09:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Ray Fowler http://www.rayfowler.org/2007/07/28/quick-takes-7-28-07/#comment-1335 Ray Fowler Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:47:07 +0000 http://www.rayfowler.org/2007/07/28/quick-takes-7-28-07/#comment-1335 I remember watching part of George Lucas' 1971 film THX-1138 on TV last year. I had never seen it before and was amazed at how good the special effects were for 1971 - until I found out that he had updated the film with all new special effects just a couple yars ago! Still, I really enjoy Star Trek: TOS and would enjoy seeing some of those classic episodes with the updated effects. I remember watching part of George Lucas’ 1971 film THX-1138 on TV last year. I had never seen it before and was amazed at how good the special effects were for 1971 – until I found out that he had updated the film with all new special effects just a couple yars ago! Still, I really enjoy Star Trek: TOS and would enjoy seeing some of those classic episodes with the updated effects.

]]> By: Tom http://www.rayfowler.org/2007/07/28/quick-takes-7-28-07/#comment-1334 Tom Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:08:32 +0000 http://www.rayfowler.org/2007/07/28/quick-takes-7-28-07/#comment-1334 Don't call it .... "Star Trek: The Original Series " if you are going to ... “1960s special effects have been replaced with 21st century computer-generated imagery to give new depth and atmosphere to various elements..." edit it. What's next "Live" news that has been "digitally enhanced"? History that has been "corrected"? Accurate true-life stories with "enriched" scenes? No wonder we have trouble identifying "TRUTH!" Don’t call it …. “Star Trek: The Original Series ” if you are going to …
“1960s special effects have been replaced with 21st century computer-generated imagery to give new depth and atmosphere to various elements…” edit it.

What’s next “Live” news that has been “digitally enhanced”?
History that has been “corrected”?
Accurate true-life stories with “enriched” scenes?

No wonder we have trouble identifying “TRUTH!”

]]>